Total 5 posts
This article provides a strict analysis of the national status of the island of Taiwan, international recognition, and the DPP's governance, pointing out that Taiwan 'was never a country to begin with.' It suggests that most DPP supporters and affiliates who advocate for Taiwan independence suffer from 'antisocial psychopathic personality traits.'
This article criticizes the Tsai Ing-wen government for mobilizing against 'four agrees' in the four referendum cases at the end of 2021. The author believes that after the recall of a legislator was passed, Tsai Ing-wen hurriedly promoted 'Four No Votes, Taiwan More Powerful' out of panic, using the entire party's strength and even abusing government power. The article satirizes that the referendum issues such as algal reefs, Ractopamine pork, and referendums with general elections were originally the DPP's own claims, but have now become 'opposing oneself,' while accusing Tsai Ing-wen of twisting 'anti-Ractopamine pork' into 'anti-US pork,' questioning if she treats her supporters as fools who lack thinking ability.
This article strongly criticizes the arguments of the DPP and New Power Party against the Free Economic Pilot Zones (FEPZ). The author satirically points out that 自經區 (zì jīng qū) sounds like 自縊 (zì yì, to hang oneself) in Chinese, and questions the green camp's shifting stance (referring to Chen Chu and Lai Ching-te's previous support). The core criticism is that opponents failed to present professional financial or legal arguments, ultimately resorting to anti-China, hate speech, and racism as their main reasons for opposition. The author believes these actions cause internal chaos in Taiwan but do no harm to mainland China.
This article contrasts the governance styles of Presidents Ma Ying-jeou and Tsai Ing-wen. During Ma's presidency, massive protests were merely about hypothetical vilification; during Tsai's presidency, leaders of various organizations mysteriously 'disappear' amid public anger, and foreign relations—a hand of good diplomatic cards—were squandered simply to attack domestic political enemies.
Addressing the news of the Ministry of Economic Affairs sponsoring an Italian volleyball team to promote 'Taiwan Excellence,' the author questions whether this is a waste of public funds. The article points out that while Italy's strength lies in football, its volleyball prowess is not as prominent, making it hard to understand why the government chose this specific team. The author links this perceived waste to the government's policy of cutting military, public, and teaching pensions under the guise of saving money, criticizing the ruling party for squandering money elsewhere while neglecting those it should care for.